Context influences the way in which a responder will interpret a text, or the way in which a composer will interpret
their artistic environment. The change in context between composer and responder is crucial to understand when studying a
text. This is particularly the case in Brave New World, where the responder's context is a direct response to the composer's original context.
Brave New
World was composed in 1932, as Modernism was beginning to infiltrate the culture of the post war era. While dictatorships
were emerging promising convenience and easy lifestyles, mass production, globalisation and monopolistic capitalism were beginning
to evolve, shifting people from their traditional Victorian values, towards a loss of individuality, detachment from nature
and an increase in corporate loyalty. Aldous Huxley witnessed the change in values, interpreting the movement of monopolistic
capitalism and the birth of globalisation, creating Brave New World, expressing his fears as to how the world would
appear in the future, and possibly to caution future generations against the current Post-Modern culture.
Henry Ford,
the father of mass production is discussed as a deitised figure in Brave New World, a direct response to the growing
world of American capitalism. The introduction of mass production also increased the leisure industry due to reduced working
hours, used as a distraction and controlling agent throughout Brave New World. The emergence of mass production also
infiltrated the culture, producing a wave popular culture on a grand scale, removing the individuality of the population.
This extensive popular culture also allowed some degree of control by producers and the media, deciding what particular expressions
of freedom, for example music, was acceptable at different times. This is addressed in Brave New World as the citizens
are told which entertainment they are allowed to enjoy, but must not stray from the activities provided.
The modern
responder views Brave New World from Post-Modernist context, which is a direct response to the Modernist culture. Due to multiple
factors, including technological advances and changes in social morals, Brave New World increases in meaning as society
accelerates towards destruction of its natural environment and progressively begins to resemble Huxley's Brave New World.
In modern
society, the effects of mass production are more prominent and globalisation has become a dominant social issue. Mass produced
popular culture has become a major industry, most obvious is the creation of plastic pop music, though it has been widely
critised by musicians and people striving to establish their individuality. American culture has overpowered the majority
of modern cultures to become the dominant cultural establishment, further enhancing the importance of Brave New World
in modern society and increasing its meaning.
Technological
context is an important issue when examining texts. While the scientific issues, and hence the moral dilemmas associated with
them, discussed in Brave New World were merely science-fiction in the 1930s, but today are more pertinent as science
is expanding to include such areas such as genetics, in-vitro fertilization (similar to the Bokanovsky Process and decanting
in Brave New World) and cosmetic surgery. Resembling the characters in the civilized society of Brave New World,
modern society strives to eliminate the majority of physical ageing through chemicals and cosmetic surgery. To some degree,
people are disgusted by ageing, but not to the same, violent extent as the citizens of Brave New World.
The society
in Brave New World holds similarities to the modern social structure. The large breaks in the social structure and
order of Brave New World is reminiscent of present society; the few small groups of well educated and highly paid individuals
maintain social stability, while there remains a large division between the elite and the majority of civilization. Globalisation,
a recently united Western Europe and the American Empire creates a similar controlling regime as explored in Brave New
World and which was existent during Huxleys life.
Social conditioning
is evident in Post-Modern society through the use of media and marketing campaigns. While the condemnation of individuality
and the driving of particular forms of entertainment are more subtle then that in Brave New World, it remains in modern
society, allowing the responder to question their role in their personal choices. Today, there is evidence of a removal of
emotion, though less obvious then that explored in Brave New World. This is most noticeable in relationship breakdowns
and the abandonment of the traditional family structure. While the loss of emotion is not used to completely prevent rebellion
as in Brave New World, it is used to control the population to some extent.
Modernist
texts such as Brave New World relied on the author presenting their issues in an easily accessible format, creating
a sense of authority for the composer and emphasizing their thoughts, creating strong themes. Although Modernism allows freedom
of thought, the majority of responders interpreted the texts in similar ways, generating accepted meanings that were widely
taught. As Post-Modernism evolved, the emphasis of interpretation shifted towards the responder, making the responder interpretation
more influential than the composers original interpretation. The shift in importance from composer to responder coincides
the objective of Post-Modernism; that there are only possibilities, no set definitions or boundaries for interpretation, though
some authors believe the emergence of Post-Modernism removes the ability of individuals to rebel against the conformity of
society, as the concepts addressed by the composer can lose some meaning in the interpretation by responders.
This current Post-Modern context, a rebellion and response to the Modernist culture, allows freedom in interpretation
and removes much of the authority of the composer. The multiple perspectives and interpretations due to differing cultural
contexts deplete the strengths of the prime issues, partially removing the intended meaning of Brave New World, and
thus reducing the impact of the text. This is particularly noticeable when studying the character John. While in a Modernist
society John was considered a heroic personality, presently he is considered to be as faulty and weak as the civilized characters,
substituting Shakespeare for Ford, leisure activities and solidarity services.
Context can
influence the interpreted meaning of a text dramatically, depending on certain social factors including technology, morals
and environment. This broad social context can be further influenced by the responders personal context, and create multiple
meanings and interpretations to a single text.
Home
Humanity and Nature in Brave New World
Blade Runner a brief overview
Blade Runner and Brave New World
Related Links
Back To Below the Chicken Coop